A closer look at the utilized radiation doses during computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) for COVID-19 patients.

Introduction: CTPA stands for computed tomography pulmonary angiography. CTPA is an X-ray imaging that combines X-rays and computer technology to create detailed images of the pulmonary arteries and veins in the lungs. This test diagnoses and monitors conditions like pulmonary embolism, arterial blockages, and hypertension. Coronavirus (COVID-19) has threatened world health over the last three years. The number of (CT) scans increased and played a vital role in diagnosing COVID-19 patients, including life-threatening pulmonary embolism (PE). This study aimed to assess the radiation dose resulted from CTPA for COVID-19 patients. Methods: Data were collected retrospectively from CTPA examinations on a single scanner in 84 symptomatic patients. The data collected included the dose length product (DLP), volumetric computed tomography dose index (CTDIvol), and size-specific dose estimate (SSDE). The organ dose and effective dose were estimated using VirtualDose software. Results: The study population included 84 patients, 52% male and 48% female, with an average age of 62. The average DLP, CTDIvol, and SSDE were 404.2 mGy cm, 13.5 mGy, and 11.6 mGy\, respectively. The mean effective doses (mSv) for males and females were 3.01 and 3.29, respectively. The maximum to minimum organ doses (mGy) between patients was 0.8 for the male bladder and 7.33 for the female lung. Conclusions: The increase in CT scans during the COVID-19 pandemic required close dose monitoring and optimization. The protocol used during CTPA should guarantee a minimum radiation dose with maximum patient benefits.

Infection control and radiation safety practices in the radiology department during the COVID-19 outbreak.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Radiology personnel must have good knowledge, experience and adherence to radiation protection and infection control practices to ensure patient safety and prevent the further spread of the COVID-19 virus. This study analysed compliance and adherence to radiation protection and infection control during COVID-19 mobile radiography. METHODS: A cross-sectional using online survey was conducted from September to December 2021. Data on demographic characteristics, adherence to radiation protection and infection control practice were collected during mobile radiography for COVID-19 patients in the study. A random sample of the radiographers working in COVID-19 centres in the United Arab Emirates. RESULTS: Responses were received from 140 participants, with a response rate of 87.5%. Females were the predominant participants (n = 81; 58%). Participants aged ages between 18-25 years (n = 46; 33%) and 26-35 years (n = 42; 30%), (n = 57; 41%) had less than five years of experience, followed by participants who had more than 15 years (n = 38; 27%). Most participants (n = 81; 57.9%) stated that they performed approximately 1-5 suspected or confirmed COVID-19 cases daily. The participants had moderate to high adherence to radiation protection, with a mean and standard deviation of 42.3 ± 6.28. Additionally, infection control adherence was high, with 82% of the participants showing high adherence. CONCLUSION: Continuous guidance, training and follow-up are recommended to increase adherence and compliance to radiation protection and infection control compliance. Educational institutions and professional organisations must collaborate to provide structured training programmes for radiology practitioners to overcome the practice and knowledge gap.

Compliance with infection control and radiation protection measures during COVID-19 in the UAE's radiology department

Introduction To guarantee patient safety and prevent the future transmission of the COVID-19 virus, radiology staff members must have solid knowledge, expertise and commitment to radiation protection and infection control practices. Compliance and adherence to infection control and radiation protection during COVID-19 radiography were examined in this study. Methods Online cross-sectional research was conducted using an electronic survey. The survey collected participants’ demographics, radiation protection compliance, and infection control practices during COVID-19 patients' radiography procedures. Results The participants adhered to patient protection and self-protection by 89.2% and 90.2%, respectively. The total adherence to radiation protection practices score was 80.2%. Older participants with more experience had significantly higher adherence scores (P = 0.0001). However, there was no discernible difference in adherence scores between the participants’ educational backgrounds. The individuals’ mean and standard deviation for infection control were 87.5% ± 16.28, respectively. Additionally, a large percentage of participants (95%) demonstrated good adherence to infection-control measures. Conclusion To promote adherence to and compliance with radiation safety and infection control, ongoing guidance, training, and follow-up is advised. To close the practice and knowledge gap, educational institutions and professional organisations must work together to offer structured training programmes for radiology practitioners.

Factors that affect student engagement in online learning in health professions education.

BACKGROUND: Student engagement is vital in achieving learning outcomes and improving students' motivation, involvement, and attitudes toward learning. The aim of this study was to identify the factors that affect student engagement in online learning in medical and health science colleges. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted among medical and health science students and faculty in May 2020. The Online Engagement Strategies Questionnaire was e-mailed to 370 students and 102 faculty members. The SPSS statistical software was used for the statistical analysis. Exploratory factor analysis was performed to identify the factors that affected the students' engagement in online learning. Composite scores were calculated for factors, separately for the student and faculty responses. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed for the student and faculty responses. RESULTS: The response rates of the students and faculty were 85.1% and 74.1%, respectively. The mean ages of the students and faculty were 20.6 and 44.6 years, respectively. Eighty-five percent of the faculty (n = 51) and 88.3% (n = 278) of the students found that the use of technology in proper communication was an important strategy to engage students in online learning. The factor analysis revealed agreement between the students and faculty regarding the factors that support student engagement in online learning. Techno-pedagogical skills were considered very important for faculty and important for students. For both faculty and students, self-directed learning skills were important, and peer-assisted learning (PAL) was fair symmetry. Nevertheless, collaborative learning (CL) was fairly symmetry to students and important to faculty. CONCLUSION: To enhance student engagement in online learning, faculty members should consider improving their techno-pedagogical skills. Moreover, by incorporating self-directed learning, CL and PAL will support student engagement. Finally, faculty development, updating of course design, and institutional policies are all required to support online learning.

Satisfaction with online learning in the new normal: perspective of students and faculty at medical and health sciences colleges.

Online learning has become the new normal in many medical and health science schools worldwide, courtesy of COVID-19. Satisfaction with online learning is a significant aspect of promoting successful educational processes. This study aimed to identify factors affecting student and faculty satisfaction with online learning during the new normal. Online questionnaires were emailed to students (n = 370) and faculty (n = 81) involved in online learning during the pandemic. The questionnaires included closed- and open-ended questions and were organised into two parts: socio-demographic information and satisfaction with online learning. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse the responses to the satisfaction scales. Students' and faculty responses to the open-ended questions were analysed using the thematic analysis method. The response rate was 97.8% for students and 86.4% for faculty. Overall satisfaction among students was 41.3% compared to 74.3% for faculty. The highest areas of satisfaction for students were communication and flexibility, whereas 92.9% of faculty were satisfied with students' enthusiasm for online learning. Technical problems led to reduced student satisfaction, while faculty were hampered by the higher workload and the required time to prepare the teaching and assessment materials. Study-load and workload, enhancing engagement, and technical issues (SWEET) were the themes that emerged from the thematic analysis as affecting student and faculty satisfaction. Adopting a combination synchronous and asynchronous approach, incorporating different applications to engage students, and timely feedback are imperative to increasing student satisfaction, while institutional support and organisational policy could enhance faculty satisfaction.

Coronavirus Disease 2019 Strategies, Examination Details, and Safety Procedures for Diagnostic Radiology Facilities: An Extensive Multicenter Experience in Istanbul, Turkey.

This study aimed to share our experiences during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic obtained in diagnostic radiology facilities of 5 training research hospitals in the Asian part of Istanbul (North Hospitals). Accordingly, we reported the used examination details, allocation of radiology staff and actions, and safety procedures for patients and radiology staff. As the corporate radiology team serving in these designated pandemic hospitals, examination details and safety procedures of some diagnostic radiology facilities among 5 training research hospitals have been identified in the current study. Our guidelines and preparedness protocol aimed to reduce patient morbidity and infection-related mortality through quick and proper diagnosis to prevent the spread of COVID-19 to our employees, patients, and the general public during the COVID-19 pandemic. Results showed that teamwork is a key factor while providing medical services. In addition, continuous communication efforts and individual responsibilities of radiology staff were remarkable during the COVID-19 pandemic. The recent situation also showed that co-operation of radiology facilities with device manufacturers and applicators is quite significant especially for development of special protocols in the frame of As Low As Reasonably Achievable. The COVID-19 pandemic has tackled several challenges in radiology among radiology departments. Therefore, continuous co-operation plans and motivational actions are highly recommended not only between radiology staff but also between radiology stakeholders and service providers in the future. Technical details of recent investigation can provide useful information about the management of diagnostic radiology departments during the fight with the COVID-19 pandemic in cities with high population density such as Istanbul.

Knowledge, Anxiety, Fear, and Psychological Distress About COVID-19 Among University Students in the United Arab Emirates.

Background: Fear of infection, the epidemic situation, unexpected lockdown, and implementation of online classes are most likely affecting the psychological well-being of students during the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, this study aims to assess the level of knowledge, anxiety, and psychological distress concerning COVID-19 and their association with fear, gender, age, history of mental illness, time spent reading about COVID-19, program of study, and type of dwelling among students in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Methods and Materials: In this cross-sectional study, 433 students participated in a web-based survey. These were students at the University of Sharjah, coming from all the emirates of the UAE. Demographic scale, COVID-19 knowledge, anxiety, fear, and psychological distress scales were used to screen these problems. Results: Of the 433 students, 278 (64.2%) were male and 155 (35.8%) were female. Overall, 353 (81.5%) exhibited adequate knowledge of COVID-19. Sixty-nine (15.9%) of students were anxious and 221 (51%) were in psychological distress. Students who exhibited anxiety concerning COVID-19 anxiety (odds ratio [OR]: 2.98) and fear (OR: 1.27), and who spent more than 4 h reading about COVID-19 (OR: 11.20) were more psychologically distressed. Students with a history of mental illness showed adequate knowledge of COVID-19; however, they were more psychologically distressed (OR: 5.93). Older students were less likely to have psychological distress (OR: 0.87). Conclusion: Students possess adequate knowledge concerning COVID-19; however, they are psychologically distressed. Age, dwelling status, history of mental illness, anxiety, and fear significantly predicted psychological distress. Frequent web-based workshops that include insight, guidance, online counseling, scheduled activity, and coping mechanisms for COVID-19 are highly recommended. The authors discuss the implications for future research and provide recommendations for students and educational institutions.